...Hundred and Ninety-Eight Thousand, Three Hundred and Thirty-Six Naira, Eighty-Eight Kobo being the Early Retirement Incentives benefit due to the Claimant at the time of the Claimant's retirement in 2008 as follows:   Basic Pay payable Monthly                                     =N=703,458.00 Leave (calculated as 12% of  Annual Basic Salary         &nb ...

... contract of employment with the 2nd Defendant and that the 1st Defendant bought the 2nd Defendant with all the staff of the 2nd Defendant.   3.         Case of the Defendants 4.         On 18/6/2025, the Defendants entered their defence and the 1st Defendant testified as DW1. Witness simply adopted his witness deposition of 9/2/2024 as his evidence in chief. Witness did not tender any document as exhibit.    5.  &nb ...

...ant’s leave bonus of the years from year 2015 to year 2023. 6.         An Order directing the Defendants to pay to the Claimant all his(sic) other salaries, emoluments, allowances and all other perquisites of office due to the Claimant or would have been due to the Claimant since the issuance of the said letter ref. SUBEB/G1680/280 dated 24th August 2017.  7.         Payment of 10% interest on the Judgment sum from the date of Judgme ...

...aration that the Claimant is equally entitled to outstandings for all ODL, BFN … 116 Foundation of Finance which the Claimant produced for 1st Defendant OPEN DISTANCE LEARNING. 6.         Declaration that the Claimant CMS - Co-operative OOU - the deducted CONTRIBUTIONS from his monthly salary, over the years, which never remitted to Cooperative Society of OOU, be paid to him at the period of retirement from the University. 7.         Dec ...

... 2019 and 2021 - 2022 which amounts to =N=451, 663. 98 (Four Hundred and Fifty-One Thousand, Six Hundred and Sixty-Three Naira and Ninety-Eight Kobo) with the exclusion of pro rata calculated 13th month salary for 2022 when the Claimant did not complete one full year. The Defendants argued that they could not pay the 13th month salary on ground of non-performance. On the other hand Claimant contended that the decision of the Defendants not to pay his 13th month’s salary for the years ...

...witnesses. 2.         Case of the Claimant 3.         The Claimant opened his case on 21/7/2025 when he testified in chief as CW1. Witness adopted his witness depositions of 17/7/2025 as his evidence in chief and tendered 15 documents as exhibits. The documents were admitted in evidence and marked as Exh. FI1 to Exh. FI15.    Under cross examination, CW1 testified that his depositions were interpreted to him ...

...ey be recalled; that 1st Claimant recalled the Defendants and paid them what they were entitled; that the 1st Defendant as the umbrella body of all workers in Oyo State led the other Defendants to picket the premises of the 2nd Claimant and all efforts to resolve the impasse have proved abortive.    2.         Based on the above abridged facts, the Claimants, employers of labour, approached this Court on 3/4/2025 via an Originating Summons and sought the dete ...

...       The Claimant is claiming entitlements to his 13th months’ salary for the Seven (7) years of 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2021 which amounts to =N=264,365.19 (Two Hundred and Sixty-Four Thousand, Three Hundred and Sixty-Five Naira and Nineteen Kobo) with the exclusion of pro rata calculated 13th month salary for 2022 when the Claimant did not complete one full year. The Defendants argued that they could not pay the 13th month salary on ground of non-perf ...

...of 60 years or 35 years of service which ever comes early. An Order of this Honourable Court setting aside the purported summary dismissal of the Claimant and the reinstatement of the Claimant without loss of status, the years of service, payment of arrears of salaries, benefits and entitlements including promotions from the 24th August 2017 when she was summarily dismissed. 2.         The Defendants entered an appearance and filed their defence processes to this ...

...ation Board (OYO-SUBEB), the 3rd Defendant is null and void, ineffectual and unlawful by reason of the effusion of time, gross irregularity, lack of reasonable cause, denial of natural justice and non-compliance with the Oyo State Civil Service Commission Regulation Part 6, sections 36, 39, 40, 41,48,49 & 56, Laws of Oyo State 2000. An Order of this Honourable Court setting aside the said letter with Reference No: SUBEB/G1680/255 and dated the 24th August 2017 by which the Defendants purpor ...

...have been due to the Claimant since the issuance of the said letter ref. SUBEB/G1680/264 dated 24th August 2017. Payment of 10% interest on the judgment sum from the date of judgment until the final liquidation of same. 2.         The Defendants entered an appearance on 7/5/2025 and on same day filed their defence processes including statement of defence, list of witnesses, witnesses’ statements on oath as well as list and copies of documents to rely on at ...

...sic Education Board letter ref. SUBEB/G1680/200 dated 24th August 2017 dismissing Claimant from service of Oyo State Government. 3.                 An Order reinstating the Claimant as an Officer of SUBEB and or an officer of Oyo State Government as a civil/public servant. 4.                 An Order directing the Defendants t ...