IN THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COURT OF
NIGERIA
IN THE ABUJA
JUDICIAL DIVISION
HOLDEN AT ABUJA
BEFORE HER LADYSHIP
HON. JUSTICE O. A. OBASEKI-OSAGHAE
DATE: JULY 8, 2024 SUIT NO: NICN/ABJ/156/2023
BETWEEN
HUIBERT TIMOTHEUS SPEELMAN
CLAIMANT
AND
AZMAN AIR SERVICES LIMITED
DEFENDANT
REPRESENTATION
Saidu Muhammad Lawal for the Claimant, with Uwais Abdulrahman.
No appearance for the Defendant.
RULING
Introduction and claims
[1] The
Claimant filed this Complaint together with the accompanying processes on 2nd June 2023 seeking the following
reliefs:
i.
A
Declaration by this
Honourable Court that the failure/refusal of the Defendant to give a month’s
notice of termination of the appointment of the Defendant or pay a month’s
salary to the Claimant in the sum of $7,500.00 (Seven Thousand Five Hundred
United States Dollars) in lieu of a month’s notice of termination constitutes a
breach of the contract between the Claimant and the Defendant as contained in
the Letter of Appointment dated 4/5/2021.
ii.
A
Declaration by this Honourable Court that the Claimant is entitled to
payment of $7,500.00 (Seven Thousand Five Hundred United States Dollars) from
the Defendant, being a month’s salary in lieu of a month’s notice of
termination of the employment of the Claimant by the Defendant.
iii.
A
Declaration by this Honourable Court that the Claimant is entitled to
general damages in the sum of N5,000,000.00
(Five Million Naira) against the Defendant as a result of the Defendant’s
breach of the contract between the Claimant and the Defendant due to the
Defendant’s failure/refusal to pay a month’s salary to the Claimant in the sum
of $7,500.00 (Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars) in lieu of a month’s notice
of termination.
iv.
A
Declaration by this Honourable Court that the Claimant is entitled to
recover from the Defendant the sum of N2,000,000.00
(Two Million Naira) being the cost of instituting the instant suit against the
Defendant.
v.
An Order
of this Honourable Court directing the Defendant to pay to the Claimant
$7,500.00 (Seven Thousand Five Hundred United States Dollars), being a month’s
salary in lieu of a month’s notice of termination of the employment of the
Claimant by the Defendant.
vi.
An Order
of this Honourable Court awarding the sum of N5,000,000.00 (Five Million Naira) as general damages in favour of
the Claimant against the Defendant for the Defendant’s breach of the contract
between the Claimant and the Defendant due to the Defendant’s failure/refusal
to pay a month’s salary to the Claimant in the sum of $7,500.00 (Seven Thousand
Five Hundred Dollars) in lieu of a month’s notice of termination.
vii.
An Order of
this Honourable awarding the sum of N2,000,000.00
(Two Million Naira) against the Defendant in favour of the Claimant, being the
cost of instituting the instant suit against the Defendant.
viii.
An
Order of this Honourable Court granting the Claimant post-judgment
interest against the Defendant at 10% per annum on the judgment sum from the
date when Judgement is entered till the date the judgment debt is completely
satisfied.
ix.
Such
Further Order(s) as this Honourable Court may deem fit to make in the
circumstance.
[2] Accompanying the Complaint is
the statement of facts, the Claimant’s statement on oath, copies of documents
to be relied on, and a motion for summary judgement brought pursuant to Order 16 Rule 1 and Order 17 of the Rules of Court 2017. The
motion is praying for the following:
1.
An Order of this Honourable Court entering summary
judgment in favour of the Claimant/Applicant against the Defendant/Respondent
in this suit as per the Claimant’s statement of facts, the reliefs claimed
therein, and the Claimant’s written statement on oath.
2. And for such further
order(s) as this Honourable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstance.
The grounds upon which the
Application is brought are as follows:
3.
On 4/5/2021, the Defendant employed the
Claimant as a Pilot (Line Captain) via a Letter of Appointment dated 4/5/2021.
1.
As part of the agreement between the Claimant and the
Defendant, as contained in the
Letter of Appointment, the salary of the Claimant was set at $6,500.00 (Six Thousand Five Hundred United States Dollars) per
month. Also, part of the agreement is that either
of the parties may terminate the contract by giving a month’s notice or by giving a month’s salary in lieu
of a month’s notice.
2.
On
10/1/2022, the Defendant increased the Claimant’s salary by $1,000.00 (One Thousand United States Dollars) from $6,500.00 (Six
Thousand Five Hundred United States
Dollars) to $7,500.00 (Seven Thousand Five Hundred United States Dollars). The said increase was confirmed via
the Defendant’s Internal Memo dated 10/1/2023.
4.
Neither a month’s notice of the termination of the
appointment of the Claimant nor a month’s salary in lieu was given to the
Claimant before the Defendant proceeded to unilaterally terminate the
Claimant’s appointment.
5.
However, despite numerous demands by the Claimant, the
Defendant has refused to pay the Claimant the one-month salary of $7,500.00 (Seven
Thousand Five Hundred United States Dollars) in lieu of the one-month notice.
6.
The
Claimant/Applicant believes that the Defendant/Respondent has no defence to the
Claim.
[3] The
motion is supported by an
affidavit sworn to on 2nd June 2023 by the Claimant to which is
annexed “Exhibits Speelman 1 to Speelman 6 and a
written address dated 2nd June
2023 and filed the same day. The Defendant was served with the
originating processes, the motion on notice and the hearing notice; and failed
to enter appearance or file any processes in defence of this action.
Submissions
of the Claimant
[4] The
Claimant submitted one issue for determination:
Whether or
not the Claimant/Applicant is entitled to summary judgment as per the
Claimant’s statement of facts, the reliefs claimed therein, and the claimant’s written
statement on oath.
[5] Learned
Counsel submitted that the summary judgment procedure prescribed under Order 16
of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (Civil Procedure) Rules 2017 is an
exception to the usual trial procedure and that the
purport of the provision is to save the time of the Court and to shield the
Court and an aggrieved Claimant from undergoing an unnecessary ordeal of a
Defendant’s frivolous defence when it is apparent from the facts of the case
that the Defendant has no defence to the claim, and he cited U.B.A. Plc.
v. Jargaba [2007] 11 NWLR (Pt.1045) 247 at 270 Paras F-H; University of Benin v. Kraus Thompson Organisation
Ltd & Anor [2007] 14 NWLR (Pt. 1055) 441 at 476 paras E-F. He submitted
that from the affidavit and exhibits, it is beyond any doubt that the defendant
neglected to perform its obligation under the employment contract Exhibit Speelman 1. He submitted that the Defendant has no defence to the claim and urged
the Court to enter judgment in favour of the Claimant.
Decision
[6] I have carefully
considered all the processes filed by the Claimant. Order 16 Rule 4 and Rule 5
(1) of the Rules of Court provide as follows:
4.
Where a party served with the
processes and documents referred to in rule 1 of this Order intends to defend
the action such a party shall, not later than the time prescribed for defence,
file:
(a) a statement of defence;
(b)
documents to be used in defence;
(c) a counter affidavit and a written brief in
reply to the application for summary
judgment; and
(d)
written statement on oath of all witnesses listed to be called by the
defendant other than witnesses to be
subpoenaed.
5. (1) Where it appears to the Court that a party has a good defence and
ought to be permitted to defend the
claim such party may be granted leave to defend.
(2) Where it appears to the Court that a party does not have a good
defence the Court may thereupon enter
judgment for the Claimant.
[7] The Defendant has not
complied with Order 16 Rule 4 despite being served with all the processes. This is indicative of the fact
that the Defendant does not intend to defend this action because it has no
defence to the action. In the absence of any defence, it is taken that the
Defendant has admitted all the facts contained in the pleadings, the Claimants
deposition on oath, and the supporting affidavit to this motion for summary
Judgement. See Egbarin v Aghoghovbia
[2003] 16 NWLR (Pt 846) 380, Tahir v Udeagbala Holdings [2004] 2 NWLR (Pt 857)
451.
[8] I am satisfied that on the affidavit
evidence particularly Exhibit Speelman 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 that the Claimant has
established his claims against the Defendant who has failed to enter appearance
and to file a defence despite being aware of the pendency of this suit.
[9] Consequently, an Order
entering summary judgement against the Defendant is hereby granted.
[10] The Defendant is Ordered to
pay the following sums to the Claimant:
1. The sum of $7,500.00 (Seven Thousand Five Hundred
United States Dollars), being one month’s salary in lieu of notice of
termination.
2. Costs in the sum of N2,000,000.00 (Two Million Naira) in favour of the Claimant.
3. The
sums are to be paid within 30 days. Thereafter, interest at the rate of 10% per
annum will be paid on any sum outstanding till the judgment debt is liquidated.
Judgement is entered accordingly.
_____________________________
Hon.
Justice O.A. Obaseki-Osaghae